Gerson v. New York State Attorney-General

139 A.D.2d 617, 527 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4390
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 18, 1988·No. Claim No. 75436·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— In a claim to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the Attorney-General in the prosecution of a business fraud, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Margolis,. J.), dated October 6, 1987, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Inasmuch as the claimant’s allegations against the defendant involve the exercise of discretion by the Attorney-General to which governmental immunity attaches (see, Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511; Tango v Tulevech, 61 NY2d 34; Rottkamp v Young, 21 AD2d 373, affd 15 NY2d 831; Matter of Covillion v Town of New Windsor, 123 AD2d 763; Brenner v County of Rockland, 67 AD2d 901, lv denied 47 NY2d 705), the Court of Claims properly dismissed the claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerson v. New York State Attorney-General, 139 A.D.2d 617, 527 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

139 A.D.2d 617 (Gerson v. New York State Attorney-General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santora v. Sheldon Silver
61 A.D.3d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Santora v. Silver
20 Misc. 3d 836 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Blouin ex rel. Estate of Pouliot v. Spitzer
356 F.3d 348 (Second Circuit, 2004)
Blouin v. Spitzer
356 F.3d 348 (Second Circuit, 2004)