Gerson v. Jamar

1 Gunby 65
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 65 (Gerson v. Jamar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerson v. Jamar, 1 Gunby 65 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Opinion

Mayo, J.

That clause of Art. 240 C. P., giving the creditor the right to an attachment when the debtor has mortgaged,'assigned or disposed of. or is about to assign or dispose of his property, rights and credits, with intent to defraud his creditors, or to give an unfair preference to some of them, would seem to imply the right to inquire into questions of fraud arising under the attachment.

2. Where a father gives a bill of sale to the son of certain stock which remain on the plantation of the vendor, who is notoriously insolvent, and the son, in payment of the price, executes a noté payable one day after date, which is not shown to have been paid, and the stock were not delivered to the vendee until a day or two before its seizure, the sale is declared to be a fraudulent simulation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Gunby 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerson-v-jamar-lactapp-1885.