Gerson v. Haines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gerson v. Haines

428 So. 2d 766, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18982

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 29, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1452

StatusPublished

This text of 428 So. 2d 766 (Gerson v. Haines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerson v. Haines, 428 So. 2d 766, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18982 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court erred in preventing descent and distribution of two decedent’s estates contrary to Sec. 732.-[767]*767601(4) Florida Statutes (1979), in re: simultaneous deaths. The only “evidence” as to the order of death was an admission in the confession of the perpetrator of the homicides.

We hold that this admission was collateral to the declarant’s admission against penal interest, to wit: the shooting of the two victims. The order of shooting as stated in the confession was hearsay and not subject to the exception to the hearsay rule as an admission against penal interest. United States v. Marquez, 462 F.2d 893 (2nd Cir. 1972); United States v. Seyfried, 435 F.2d 696 (7th Cir.1970); People v. Leach, 15 Cal.3d 419, 124 Cal.Rptr. 752, 541 P.2d 296 (1975); State v. Self, 88 N.M. 37, 536 P.2d 1093 (1975).

Therefore the final judgment under review is reversed with directions to permit descent and distribution in accordance with Sec. 732.601(4) Florida Statutes (1979).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court erred in preventing descent and distribution of two decedent’s estates contrary to Sec. 732.-[767]*767601(4) Florida Statutes (1979), in re: simultaneous deaths. The only “evidence” as to the order of death was an admission in the confession of the perpetrator of the homicides.

We hold that this admission was collateral to the declarant’s admission against penal interest, to wit: the shooting of the two victims. The order of shooting as stated in the confession was hearsay and not subject to the exception to the hearsay rule as an admission against penal interest. United States v. Marquez, 462 F.2d 893 (2nd Cir. 1972); United States v. Seyfried, 435 F.2d 696 (7th Cir.1970); People v. Leach, 15 Cal.3d 419, 124 Cal.Rptr. 752, 541 P.2d 296 (1975); State v. Self, 88 N.M. 37, 536 P.2d 1093 (1975).

Therefore the final judgment under review is reversed with directions to permit descent and distribution in accordance with Sec. 732.601(4) Florida Statutes (1979).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

428 So. 2d 766, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerson-v-haines-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack