Gershon v. Tobacco Brokers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gershon v. Tobacco Brokers, Inc.

47 A.D.2d 619, 364 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8772

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 47 A.D.2d 619 (Gershon v. Tobacco Brokers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gershon v. Tobacco Brokers, Inc., 47 A.D.2d 619, 364 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 1, 1974, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment made pursuant to CPLR 3213, uanimously reversed, on the law, and motion granted. Appellant shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The check executed and delivered to plaintiff was a “non-refundable deposit” except if there was a “wilful default” by the plaintiff. Defendant does not claim any such default. The attorney’s short affidavit submitted in opposition to plaintiff’s motion is of no value whatsoever and alleges nothing even slightly indicative of a defense to the action. The existence of another action, brought by plaintiff against the sole shareholder, officer and director of the defendant herein for breach of contract, is not a bar to 'an award of summary judgment in this action. Settle order on notice. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 1, 1974, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment made pursuant to CPLR 3213, uanimously reversed, on the law, and motion granted. Appellant shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The check executed and delivered to plaintiff was a “non-refundable deposit” except if there was a “wilful default” by the plaintiff. Defendant does not claim any such default. The attorney’s short affidavit submitted in opposition to plaintiff’s motion is of no value whatsoever and alleges nothing even slightly indicative of a defense to the action. The existence of another action, brought by plaintiff against the sole shareholder, officer and director of the defendant herein for breach of contract, is not a bar to 'an award of summary judgment in this action. Settle order on notice. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 619, 364 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gershon-v-tobacco-brokers-inc-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack