Gersh v. Anglin

CourtDistrict Court, D. Montana
DecidedAugust 8, 2019
Docket9:17-cv-00050
StatusUnknown

This text of Gersh v. Anglin (Gersh v. Anglin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gersh v. Anglin, (D. Mont. 2019).

Opinion

BH Blas Bs □□□ AUG 08 2019 Clerk, U.S District Court District Of Montana IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Missoula FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

TANYA GERSH, CV 17-S0-—M-DLC-JCL Plaintiff, and ORDER TIMOTHY C. FOX, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Montana, Intervenor, VS. ANDREW ANGLIN, Defendant.

Following a hearing on Plaintiff Tanya Gersh’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 201), United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered his Findings and Recommendation on July 15, 2019, recommending that the Court (1) grant the motion for default judgment; (2) award Gersh $4,042,438 in

compensatory damages and $10,000,000 in punitive damages; and (3) issue a

permanent injunction ordering Defendant Andrew Anglin to remove from his website the blog posts that caused Gersh’s damages. (Doc. 211.) No party -]-

timely objected to the Findings and Recommendation, and accordingly all parties have waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no

party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-53 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” Wash. Mut., Inc. v. United States, 856 F.3d 711, 721 (9th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 211), the Court finds no clear error. Default judgment is an appropriate sanction for Anglin’s absolute refusal to defend. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(d), 55(b)(2); see Ringgold Corp. v. Worrall, 880 F.2d 1138, 1141 (9th Cir. 1989); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987); Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986). Judge Lynch reviewed evidence regarding the measure of Gersh’s damages, and he did not clearly err in finding that they total $4,042,438. Nor is there clear error in the recommendation that the Court award $10,000,000 in punitive damages. See Mont. Code Ann. § 27—1—221(7)(b); Blue Ridge Homes, Inc. v. Thein, 191 P.3d 374, 387 (Mont. 2008); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell, 5387 U.S. 408 (2002). Finally, the Court agrees that a permanent injunction should be ordered to reduce future harassment of Gersh and her family.

he

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: (1) Judge Lynch’s Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 211) is ADOPTED IN FULL; (2) Defendant Andrew Anglin shall permanently remove from his website the blog posts encouraging his readers to contact Plaintiff Tanya Gersh and Gersh’s family, including all photographs and images of the family and comment boards associated therewith; (3) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment against Defendant Anglin and in favor of Plaintiff Gersh for compensatory damages in the amount of $4,042,438 and for punitive damages in the amount of $10,000,000. DATED this eh day of August, 2019. he itis Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court

_3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCool
782 F.2d 1470 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Blue Ridge Homes, Inc. v. Thein
2008 MT 264 (Montana Supreme Court, 2008)
Washington Mutual, Inc. v. United States
856 F.3d 711 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Ringgold Corp. v. Worrall
880 F.2d 1138 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gersh v. Anglin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gersh-v-anglin-mtd-2019.