Gerry Dwayne Dickens v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 27, 2014
Docket01-13-00820-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gerry Dwayne Dickens v. State (Gerry Dwayne Dickens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerry Dwayne Dickens v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Opinion issued February 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00820-CR ——————————— GERRY DWAYNE DICKENS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th Judicial District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 69694

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Gerry Dwayne Dickens, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of

unauthorized use of a vehicle.* The trial court found Dickens guilty and, in

accordance with the terms of his plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced

* See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.07 (West Supp. 2013). him to confinement for 200 days in the Brazoria County Jail. Acting pro se,

Dickens filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial

court’s permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be

dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has

not been made part of the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id.

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the

defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant did not

appeal any pre-trial matters, and the trial court did not give permission for

appellant to appeal. The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v.

State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no

right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675,

680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to

ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule

25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of

the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss

appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his appellant’s brief as moot.

2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Chavez v. State
183 S.W.3d 675 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gerry Dwayne Dickens v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerry-dwayne-dickens-v-state-texapp-2014.