Gerrity Company Inc. v. Pace Constr., No. Cv92 29 94 40 (Mar. 29, 1993)

Connecticut Superior Court

Gerrity Company Inc. v. Pace Constr., No. Cv92 29 94 40 (Mar. 29, 1993)

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 2932

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 17, 1993

DocketNo. CV92 29 94 40

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 2932 (Gerrity Company Inc. v. Pace Constr., No. Cv92 29 94 40 (Mar. 29, 1993)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerrity Company Inc. v. Pace Constr., No. Cv92 29 94 40 (Mar. 29, 1993), 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 2932 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Probable cause is found to secure a claim against defendant Pace Construction Inc. in the amount of $115,000.00, which amount includes principal and interest to today but does not include sales tax.

At the present time, the plaintiff appears to be adequately secured by the labor and material performance bond. Because the plaintiff is so secured, the application for a prejudgment remedy of garnishment is denied.

THIM, JUDGE

N.B. This memorandum was written before the court received defense counsel's letter dated March 15, 1993. The case cited by defense counsel, O G Industries, Inc. v. New Milford, 29 Conn. App. 783,790 (1992), does not stand for the proposition that a subcontractor is barred by General Statutes 49-42 from suing a general contractor hired to perform a public project.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Probable cause is found to secure a claim against defendant Pace Construction Inc. in the amount of $115,000.00, which amount includes principal and interest to today but does not include sales tax.

At the present time, the plaintiff appears to be adequately secured by the labor and material performance bond. Because the plaintiff is so secured, the application for a prejudgment remedy of garnishment is denied.

THIM, JUDGE

N.B. This memorandum was written before the court received defense counsel's letter dated March 15, 1993. The case cited by defense counsel, O G Industries, Inc. v. New Milford, 29 Conn. App. 783,790 (1992), does not stand for the proposition that a subcontractor is barred by General Statutes 49-42 from suing a general contractor hired to perform a public project.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 2932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerrity-company-inc-v-pace-constr-no-cv92-29-94-40-mar-29-1993-connsuperct-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack