Gerrell v. Davis Construction & Engineers, Inc.
Opinion
1. Where a grading contractor brought suit against another contractor seeking to recover a balance alleged to be due and for which “defendant obligated to pay plaintiff,” for services performed in the grading and moving of dirt on land of a third party, who was not a party to the action, allegations and exhibits relative to the recording of a claim for lien against the land and a prayer for special judgment foreclosing a lien thereon, being wholly inappropriate to the action (Cf. Buck v. Tifton Mfg. Co., 4 Ga. App. 695 [320]*320(62 SE 107); Chambers Lmbr. Co. v. Gilmer, 60 Ga. App. 832, 835 (5 SE2d 84)), are to be regarded as surplusage in determining whether the petition can withstand a general demurrer.
2. Where the petition contains the bare essentials of a common law action on contract and prays for a general judgment as damages for its breach a general demurrer should be overruled.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
157 S.E.2d 327 (Gerrell v. Davis Construction & Engineers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.