Gerrard v. . Norris

Court of King's Bench

Gerrard v. . Norris

1 N.C. 667

DecidedJuly 5, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 667 (Gerrard v. . Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerrard v. . Norris, 1 N.C. 667 (kingsbench 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

In trespass, on not guilty, there was a special verdict: That the plaintiff as in under an elegit, by which the land was extended; judgment being Crastin. Trin. 15 Jac., which was the 20th of June, etc. The defendant claimed under a statute acknowledged the same term, but before the judgment, viz., the 2d of June. I have heard that it was adjudged that the plaintiff had the best right, for he claimed under a judgment, and all the term is, in law, but one day.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In trespass, on not guilty, there was a special verdict: That the plaintiff as in under an elegit, by which the land was extended; judgment being Crastin. Trin. 15 Jac., which was the 20th of June, etc. The defendant claimed under a statute acknowledged the same term, but before the judgment, viz., the 2d of June. I have heard that it was adjudged that the plaintiff had the best right, for he claimed under a judgment, and all the term is, in law, but one day.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerrard-v-norris-kingsbench-1793.