Gernert v. Albert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Gernert v. Albert

28 A. 576, 160 Pa. 95, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 772

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 26, 1894·No. Appeal, No. 179·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is a scire facias on a purchase money mortgage, given by the defendant to the plaintiff. The affidavit interposed by the mortgagor was adjudged insufficient, and rightly so, as we' think. All that can be profitably said in relation to the proposition for which he contends will be found in the clear and able opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas. On that opinion we affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is a scire facias on a purchase money mortgage, given by the defendant to the plaintiff. The affidavit interposed by the mortgagor was adjudged insufficient, and rightly so, as we' think. All that can be profitably said in relation to the proposition for which he contends will be found in the clear and able opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas. On that opinion we affirm the judgment.

Gernert v. Albert, 28 A. 576, 160 Pa. 95, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 772 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

28 A. 576 (Gernert v. Albert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related