Germofert Fertilizer Co. v. Scruggs

81 S.E. 667, 97 S.C. 396, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 188
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 6, 1914
Docket8846
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 S.E. 667 (Germofert Fertilizer Co. v. Scruggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Germofert Fertilizer Co. v. Scruggs, 81 S.E. 667, 97 S.C. 396, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 188 (S.C. 1914).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

*397 ■ The facts in this case are similar to those in the case of Germofert Mfg. Co. v. S. F. Castles, 81 S. E. 665, in which the opinion has just been filed. In that case, the motion to strike out certain allegations in the defenses set up in the answer was made upon .the ground that said allegations were sham and irrelevant, while the motion in the present case was based upon the ground that similar allegations were irrelevant and redundant.

There is no. difference in principle between the two cases.

Order reversed.

Mr. Justice Gage did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richmond Guano Co. v. Kirkpatrick
98 S.E. 327 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 S.E. 667, 97 S.C. 396, 1914 S.C. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/germofert-fertilizer-co-v-scruggs-sc-1914.