Germer v. Ensign

26 A. 657, 155 Pa. 464, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1269
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 22, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 96·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order refusing the application of the appellants to open the biddings at a sheriff’s sale. We cannot see why the application was not granted. It seems to have been made promptly, accompanied by an offer to raise the bid of the purchaser by the sum of five hundred dollars at least. This was' a substantial advance upon the price at which the pz'operty had been struck down, and we should be glad if the learned judge had given some reason for denying the appellants the opportunity they asked. The subject is however one which belongs to the class over which the courts exercise a discretionary power, in view of all the circumstances presented to them for consideration. We cannot presume that this power was abused in this instance, and except for an abuse of it we do not ordinarily interfere izz matters resting in the discretion of the lower courts.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Germer v. Ensign, 26 A. 657, 155 Pa. 464, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1269 (Pa. 1893).

26 A. 657 (Germer v. Ensign) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Mechanics Trust Co.
39 Pa. D. & C. 202 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1940)
First National Bank v. Mount
1 A.2d 547 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Schekter v. Katler
95 Pa. Super. 226 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Lefever v. Kline
143 A. 488 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Barnes v. Skiles
30 Pa. Super. 418 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Appeal of Laird
2 Pa. Super. 300 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)