Germany v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Germany v. State

120 S.E. 18, 31 Ga. App. 174, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 817

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 15, 1923

Docket14931

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 18 (Germany v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Germany v. State, 120 S.E. 18, 31 Ga. App. 174, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 817 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Eor the alleged reason that the conviction was had upon the uncorroborated testimony of accomplices, the defendant, contends that the court erroneously overruled his motion for a new trial. It is clear, from the record, that the conviction was fully authorized by the evi[175]*175dence and was not dependent wholly upon the evidence of accomplices. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Decided November 15, 1923. John B. Cooper, W. 0. Cooper Jr., for plaintiff in error. B. M. Owen, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodwortfo, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Eor the alleged reason that the conviction was had upon the uncorroborated testimony of accomplices, the defendant, contends that the court erroneously overruled his motion for a new trial. It is clear, from the record, that the conviction was fully authorized by the evi[175]*175dence and was not dependent wholly upon the evidence of accomplices. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Decided November 15, 1923. John B. Cooper, W. 0. Cooper Jr., for plaintiff in error. B. M. Owen, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodwortfo, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.E. 18, 31 Ga. App. 174, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/germany-v-state-gactapp-1923.