Germanovich v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

270 A.D.2d 863, 705 N.Y.S.2d 910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2000·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the application of third-party plaintiffs for judgment against third-party defendant for attorneys’ fees, costs and disbursements incurred in the defense of the primary action. Third-party plaintiffs brought their application after the primary action was settled and an unconditional stipulation of settlement signed by the parties was filed. Although a trial court has the power “to exercise supervisory control over all phases of pending actions and proceedings” (Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold, 48 NY2d 51, 54), it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a motion after the action has been “unequivocally terminated * * * [by the execution of] an express, unconditional stipulation of discontinuance” (Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold, supra, at 56; see, Kurtz v Kurtz, 135 AD2d 615; Matter of Town of Johnstown v City of Gloversville, 36 AD2d 143, 145, lv dismissed 29 NY2d 639). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Counsel Fees.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Germanovich v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 270 A.D.2d 863, 705 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 863 (Germanovich v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP v. JOHNSON, BRIAN J.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. v. Johnson
107 A.D.3d 1588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)