Germania Importing Co. v. United States

8 Ct. Cust. 219, 1917 WL 20099, 1917 CCPA LEXIS 87
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Germania Importing Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 Ct. Cust. 467
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided December 4, 1917·No. No. 1751·Published

Opinions

De Vries, Judge,

defivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Tbe subject of tbis appeal was imported from Bremen, Germany, and invoiced as “bnoleum cement.” Its exact imported status, tbe record shows, was accurately described by tbe secretary of tbe importing company, who testified at tbe trial below, in tbe following language:

Linoleum cement is a composition of oxidized linseed oil and resin and kauri, and it comes in mass in cahvas burlap sacks holding 200 pounds to the sack, and it is covered with a kind of a chalk or clay of some kind to prevent it sticking to the burlap bag. It is soft, more like rubber only it has not quite the elasticity; it is like crude rubber except it is clearer looking.

[220]*220The same witness further described its use and the method of its application thereto as follows:

They grind it up, put a certain amount of clay coloring matter and may be some other things in it; that is ground up, run through a machine, with a steel roller at the base and a bronze roller on top with a design embossed on it; they run a sheet of paper through over which is this lincrusta cement after it has been mixed with these other ingredients; this is pressed through these two rolls with a certain amount of heat, and it comes out fast to the paper with the design embossed upon it. *******
Q. You say you cut it up like you would a piece of soap and put it into some kind of a machine?—A. In a grinder, a good deal like a paper mill.
Q. Mixed in with-?—A. Coloring matter and also—I don’t know if they .use wood Sour or china clay. Something like that.

The merchandise was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York as oxidized linseed oil under the provisions of paragraph 45 of the tariff act of 1913, providing a rate of duty of 10 cents per gallon óf pounds upon that material in language as follows:

45. Oils, expressed-; * * * flaxseed and linseed oil, raw, boiled, or oxidized, 10 cents per gallon of pounds; * * *.

The chief claims of the protestant, who is appellant here, are that the merchandise should be rated for duty either as a nonenum-erated article under paragraph 385, or as a cement not otherwise provided for under the provisions of paragraph 74 of the tariff act of 1913, reading as follows:

74. Plaster rock or gypsum, crude, ground, or calcined, pearl hardening for paper makers’ use; white, nonstaining Portland cement, Keene’s cement, or other cement of which gypsum is the component material of chief value, and all other cements not specially provided for in this section, 10 per cent ad valorem.

There are other claims in the protest unnecessary of consideration. That the merchandise was dutiable as a cement was mostly relied upon by appellant.

Appropriate classification of this merchandise for dutiable purposes depends entirely upon the state or condition to which it has been brought by the processes applied thereto in its production. Concededly, in the course of its production, it at one time was oxidized linseed oil. Whether or not there have been applied to it sufficient processes, by which the material per se, or, by addition thereto of other materials in the course of such processing, to carry the merchandise beyond the state or condition of oxidized linseed oil and into some other condition described by the tariff act, under which it would, therefore, become dutiable, is the question here for decision.

It is claimed by the importer that the article is oxidized linseed oil to which there has been added rosin and kauri by intermixing [221]*221and grinding, wherefore the importation has been brought to a condition properly described as a “cement,” and for that reason is properly dutiable as a cement not specially provided for under the provisions of said paragraph 74.

The court is of the opinion that if as imported sufficient rosin and kauri have been added to the material to bring it to that condition in which it is to be united with other materials in the manufacture of lincrusta wall paper, whether or not it would be dutiable as a “cement” as that term is used in the catch-all provision of paragraph 74, supra, would present a serious question, unnecessary of determination in this case.

While the testimony upon the subject is meager and unsatisfactory the recognized standard works upon the subject make this plain. Perhaps the most satisfactory and accepted work explanatory of the processing of linseed oil into oxidized linseed oil, and thereafter into a cement, as it is used in the manufacture of linoleum, so called, and in other similar uses, is Spoils' Encyclopedia (vol. II, p. 1002, et seq.). It appears therefrom that oxidized linseed oil is made by several consecutive processes. In the first place there are added to the raw linseed oil as driers ground litharge and red lead. (These additions to the extent of one-half of 1 per cent each are also used as testers to determine whether or not the linseed oil is of the requisite quality for its subsequent use in the manufacture of linoleum and other similar, articles.) By a complicated arrangement the boiled oil is permitted to run down over pieces of thin cotton fabric technically known as scrim. This scrim is held tight and perpendicular between bars. The oil is then distributed evenly along it so that it flows over the scrim uniformly. It is further stated by the same authority of the process as follows:

Each time the scrim is flooded, its surface becomes covered with a thin film of oil, which oxidizes or solidifies, and slightly increases the' thickness. In 6-8 weeks, according to the temperature, the total thickness of the cotton fabric and the oxidized oil upon it will amount to about $ in.; the whole piece is then known as a “skin.” * * * When thick enough, the skins are removed by cutting them immediately below the upper bars, allowing them to fall to the ground, and cutting them into smaller pieces. The oxidized oil obtained in the above manner, is a yellow, translucent substance, of great elasticity, and possessing a smell somewhat resembling that of fresh paint. * * *
The cotton tissue inclosed between the two layers of oxidized oil is found to be completely rotten, the vapors given off by the oil during oxidation having an extremely injurious action, not only upon textile fabrics, but also upon wood, iron, and mortar.

The product of this aerating process is oxidized linseed oil. In this composition there is, therefore, a rosin content added as a drier. •It is a part of the ground litharge and red lead. In the process, including the boiling of the oil, much of this content may settle, but [222]*222what proportion is not made certain by tbe accepted authorities or the record.

In its use for the manufacture of linoleum wherein it is further processed to a status or condition known as “cement,” the same authority describes the processes applied:

When freshly ground, the oil feels damp, but it dries in 2-3 hours, and is then ready for the following process. This consists in mixing it with a certain proportion of rosin and kauri gum (see Resinous Substances—-Kami, Rosin). The gum, which need not be of the best quality, is first ground under “edge-runners," and sifted; the rosin is added in lumps.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Germania Importing Co. v. United States, 8 Ct. Cust. 219, 1917 WL 20099, 1917 CCPA LEXIS 87 (ccpa 1917).

8 Ct. Cust. 219 (Germania Importing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.