German v. Wainwright

2 U.S. 266
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1796·Published

Opinion

AT the last term a non pros. had been entered by consent, on a presumption, that, at the preceding term, a rule to try or nonpros, had been obtained. On examining the record, however, no such rule was entered; and now Thomas and E. Tilghman objected to take off the non pros, notwithstanding the mistake, unless the plaintiff was put on the same footing, as if the mistake had not happened, by entering a rule to try or non pros, as of the last term, so that it might operate at the present term, should the trial be postponed by the plaintiff’s laches. Lewis, for the plaintiff, said he thought the proposition reasonable; and the rule was entered accordingly, by order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

German v. Wainwright, 2 U.S. 266 (1796).

2 U.S. 266 (German v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.