German Evangelical Church v. Schindler

108 P. 178, 56 Or. 247, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 167
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedApril 26, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 108 P. 178 (German Evangelical Church v. Schindler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
German Evangelical Church v. Schindler, 108 P. 178, 56 Or. 247, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 167 (Or. 1910).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Eakin

delivered the opinion of the court.

The motion for judgment upon the pleadings was properly granted by the circuit court. Section 2218, B. & C. [249]*249Comp., being a part of the re-enactment of the Justice Code of 1899, provides that:

“If it appear on the trial of any cause before a justice of the peace from the evidence of either party, or from the pleadings that the title to real property is in question, which title shall be disputed by the other party, the justice shall immediately make an entry thereof in his docket and cease all further proceedings in the cause, and shall certify and return (the cause) to the circuit court.”

Prior to the enactment of the statute above quoted, the justice was only ousted of jurisdiction in such a case when it appeared from the evidence that the title to lands was in question. Hill’s Code, § 2081; Malarkey v. O’Leary, 34 Or. 493, 497 (56 Pac. 521.) But Section 2218, B. & C. Comp., which is part of the enactment of 1899, embraced the substance of Section 2080, with the additional provision that, if it appears “from the pleadings” that the title to real property is in question, it shall terminate the jurisdiction of the justice to proceed further with the trial, thus contemplating that the title, when alleged in the complaint, “may be disputed by the other party” by his answer, and in that manner terminate the proceedings in the justice court as effectually as by the evidence'

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the owner in fee simple of the premises and entitled to possession thereof. The answer denies this allegation, and thus by the pleadings it appears that the title to the real property is in question, an issue which the justice has no jurisdiction to try.

The judgment is .affirmed, Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Moore did not sit in this case nor take part in its decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fish v. Bishop
156 P.2d 204 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1945)
Blue v. Green
7 Alaska 47 (D. Alaska, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 P. 178, 56 Or. 247, 1910 Ore. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/german-evangelical-church-v-schindler-or-1910.