German American Metal & Novelty Works, Inc. v. Shubert-Anderson Co.
This text of 124 A.D. 912 (German American Metal & Novelty Works, Inc. v. Shubert-Anderson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hooker and Rich, JJ., dissented on the following ground: The allegation of the' authority of the defendant’s.agent McBride is denied by the answer; there is no claim he had actual authority, and the proof of his ostensible' authority is merely that he was called general manag.er and had an office in defendant’s building. This is insufficient. (Camacho v. Hamilton Bank Note & Eng. Co., 2 App. Div. 369, 371.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D. 912, 108 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/german-american-metal-novelty-works-inc-v-shubert-anderson-co-nyappdiv-1908.