Germaine James v. Creekbend Apts.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 29, 2007
Docket14-07-00340-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Germaine James v. Creekbend Apts. (Germaine James v. Creekbend Apts.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Germaine James v. Creekbend Apts., (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00340-CV

GERMAINE JAMES, Appellant

V.

CREEKBEND APTS., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 878555

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from a final judgment signed December 20, 2007.  Appellant filed an untimely motion for new trial on December 22, 2007.  Appellant=s notice of appeal was due March 20, 2007.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a) (stating that notice of appeal must be filed within ninety days after date judgment is signed when appellant has filed a timely motion for new trial).  The notice of appeal was not filed until April 7, 2007.


Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed timely.  A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time.  See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 9 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26).  Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3

On November 8, 2007, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court=s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Germaine James v. Creekbend Apts., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/germaine-james-v-creekbend-apts-texapp-2007.