Germain v. Staten Island Boat Sales, Inc.

248 A.D.2d 507, 669 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2578
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 16, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 248 A.D.2d 507 (Germain v. Staten Island Boat Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Germain v. Staten Island Boat Sales, Inc., 248 A.D.2d 507, 669 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, fraud, and negligence, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered March 21, 1997, as (1) denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, (2) granted that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was to dismiss his claim for punitive damages, and (3), upon searching the record pursuant to CPLR 3212 (b), dismissed the cause of action sounding in fraud.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly dismissed the cause of action sounding in fraud, since the allegations of fraud clearly relate to the alleged breach of contract (Alamo Contract Bldrs. v CTF Hotel Co., 242 AD2d 643; Weisberger v Goldstein, 242 AD2d 622; Hadari v Leshchinsky, 242 AD2d 557). Further, contrary to the plaintiffs assertion, the court did not dismiss his cause of action sounding in negligence. However, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the claim for punitive damages (see, Zabas v Kard, 194 AD2d 784). Finally, the Supreme Court correctly denied that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the cause of action alleging breach of contract, as there is a question of fact as to whether the defendant materially breached the contract (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Productive Recycling v Town of Smithtown, 222 AD2d 663).

O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marlowe v. Ferrari of Long Island, Inc.
61 A.D.3d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
34-35th Corp. v. 1-10 Industry Associates
2 A.D.3d 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Daigle v. West
225 F. Supp. 2d 236 (N.D. New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D.2d 507, 669 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/germain-v-staten-island-boat-sales-inc-nyappdiv-1998.