Germain v. Nichol

299 S.E.2d 335, 278 S.C. 508, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 218
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1983
Docket21846
StatusPublished
Cited by52 cases

This text of 299 S.E.2d 335 (Germain v. Nichol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Germain v. Nichol, 299 S.E.2d 335, 278 S.C. 508, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 218 (S.C. 1983).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an action in conversion resulting in a $1,200 verdict for respondent.

Three of appellant’s four exceptions violate Supreme Court Rule 4, § 6 because they do not contain a complete assignment of error. See South Carolina Insurance Department v. Estrada, S. C. 287 S. E. (2d) 475 (1982); Barbee v. Poston, S. C. 289 S. E. (2d) 649 (1982). We dismiss these exceptions.

Appellant’s remaining exception is to the effect that the evidence does not justify the award of actual damages. Appellant does not present this Court with any of the trial testimony. Appellant has the burden of providing this Court with a sufficient record upon which this Court can make its decision. Wilson v. American Casualty Co., 252 S. C. 393, 166 S. E. (2d) 797 (1969). We find appellant has failed to satisfy this burden.

Furthermore, in the Statement of the case appellant concedes that respondent’s evidence was uncontroverted. The Statement of the case recites: “[T]he plaintiff in the trial of the cause presented evidence to establish the conversion of plaintiff’s property and the resulting damage. The plaintiff’s evidence was uncontroverted as the Defendant was not present at trial and the defense put on no witnesses.” The parties are bound by the Statement of the case. Patel, et al. v. Southern Brokers, Ltd., S. C. 289 S. E. (2d) 642 (1982).

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Ness, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lisa Weston v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2025
Vidhyaben R. Patel v. Hardik R. Patel (1)
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2024
Benita Dinkins-Robinson v. Alan Ratner
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2023
Palmetto Pointe v. Island Pointe
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2023
Wells Fargo Bank v. Michelle Hodges
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2022
Jeanette's Loving In-Home Care Agency v. SCDHHS
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021
Cole v. Heyward
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021
Malpass v. Burns
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2021
Walker v. SAIC Engineering
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2017
Lazaro v. Burriss Electrical
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2014
Carpenter v. Measter
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013
LaSalle Bank v. Toney
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2012
On Time Transportation v. SC Workers' Compensation
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2011
Davidson v. City of Beaufort
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2011
SCDSS v. Ruth W.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2011
Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Coffey
698 S.E.2d 244 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2010)
Smith v. Smith
687 S.E.2d 720 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2009)
James v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008
Dickey v. Clarke Nursing Home
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2007
Horger v. Orangeburg County
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2005

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 S.E.2d 335, 278 S.C. 508, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/germain-v-nichol-sc-1983.