Germain v. Germain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Germain v. Germain

243 A.D. 844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 844 (Germain v. Germain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Germain v. Germain, 243 A.D. 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Action upon policy in Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life and Accident Insurance Association. The policy was payable to plaintiffs and defendants. Insured signed an application to change beneficiaries to his two sons, the plaintiffs herein, which application contained the signature of a witness. A new certificate was issued naming plaintiffs as beneficiaries. There is nothing before this court to show that the constitution and by-laws of the association were not followed in changing the beneficiaries. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action upon policy in Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life and Accident Insurance Association. The policy was payable to plaintiffs and defendants. Insured signed an application to change beneficiaries to his two sons, the plaintiffs herein, which application contained the signature of a witness. A new certificate was issued naming plaintiffs as beneficiaries. There is nothing before this court to show that the constitution and by-laws of the association were not followed in changing the beneficiaries. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/germain-v-germain-nyappdiv-1935.