Gerlock v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

411 So. 2d 1386, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19747
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1982·No. No. AI-436·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We find, on consideration of petition for writ of mandamus and response thereto, that petitioner’s claims are devoid of merit. Accordingly, order to show cause is discharged and the writ denied.

BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur. SHIVERS, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerlock v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 411 So. 2d 1386, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19747 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

411 So. 2d 1386 (Gerlock v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKahn v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION
399 So. 2d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Daniels v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm'n
401 So. 2d 1351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Moore v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission
289 So. 2d 719 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)