Home/Ninth Circuit/Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low

Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low

339 F.3d 1078, 2003 WL 21919268
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 12, 2003
DocketNos. 01-17023, 01-17433, 02-15282
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 339 F.3d 1078 (Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low, 339 F.3d 1078, 2003 WL 21919268 (9th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

The Supreme Court of the United States has reversed our decision in Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low, 296 F.3d 832 (9th Cir.2002), and remanded the case for further consideration in light of American Insurance Ass’n v. Garamendi — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2374, 156 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003). See Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Garamendi, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2638, 156 [1080]*1080L.Ed.2d 652 (2003). We, in turn, remand this matter to the district court for such further proceedings as may be appropriate in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gerling Global v. Garamendi
Ninth Circuit, 2005
Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Garamendi
400 F.3d 803 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
GERLING GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP. OF AMERICA GERLING GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP.—U.S. BRANCH GERLING GLOBAL LIFE REINSURANCE COMPANY GERLING GLOBAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY GERLING AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY AND CONSTITUTION INSURANCE CORP., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES-CROSS-APPELLANTS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS v. HARRY W. LOW, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE-DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT-PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. HARRY W. LOW, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE-DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. WINTERTHUR INTERNATIONAL AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, WINTERTHUR INTERNATIONAL AMERICA UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, REGENT INSURANCE COMPANY REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, UNIGARD INDEMNITY COMPANY UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY AND BLUE RIDGE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES-CROSS-APPELLANTS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS v. HARRY W. LOW, IN HIS CAPACITY AS INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE-DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. AMERICAN INSURANCE ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES-CROSS-APPELLANTS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS v. HARRY W. LOW, IN HIS CAPACITY AS INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE-DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
339 F.3d 1078 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
339 F.3d 1078, 2003 WL 21919268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerling-global-reinsurance-corp-of-america-v-low-ca9-2003.