Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low

Ninth Circuit

Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low

339 F.3d 1078, 2003 WL 21919268

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 12, 2003·No. Nos. 01-17023, 01-17433, 02-15282·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Supreme Court of the United States has reversed our decision in Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low, 296 F.3d 832 (9th Cir.2002), and remanded the case for further consideration in light of American Insurance Ass’n v. Garamendi — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2374, 156 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003). See Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Garamendi, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2638, 156 [1080]*1080L.Ed.2d 652 (2003). We, in turn, remand this matter to the district court for such further proceedings as may be appropriate in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Supreme Court of the United States has reversed our decision in Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low, 296 F.3d 832 (9th Cir.2002), and remanded the case for further consideration in light of American Insurance Ass’n v. Garamendi — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2374, 156 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003). See Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Garamendi, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2638, 156 [1080]*1080L.Ed.2d 652 (2003). We, in turn, remand this matter to the district court for such further proceedings as may be appropriate in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low, 339 F.3d 1078, 2003 WL 21919268 (9th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

339 F.3d 1078 (Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America v. Low) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

GERLING GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP. OF AMERICA GERLING GLOBAL REINSURANCE CORP.—U.S. BRANCH GERLING GLOBAL LIFE REINSURANCE COMPANY GERLING GLOBAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY GERLING AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY AND CONSTITUTION INSURANCE CORP., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES-CROSS-APPELLANTS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS v. HARRY W. LOW, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE-DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT-PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. HARRY W. LOW, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE-DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. WINTERTHUR INTERNATIONAL AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, WINTERTHUR INTERNATIONAL AMERICA UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, REGENT INSURANCE COMPANY REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, UNIGARD INDEMNITY COMPANY UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY AND BLUE RIDGE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES-CROSS-APPELLANTS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS v. HARRY W. LOW, IN HIS CAPACITY AS INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE-DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. AMERICAN INSURANCE ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN RE-INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES-CROSS-APPELLANTS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS v. HARRY W. LOW, IN HIS CAPACITY AS INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE-DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

339 F.3d 1078 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Opinion

Related