Gerlich v. Gerlich

204 N.W. 465, 163 Minn. 400, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1278
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 5, 1925·No. No. 24,639.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dibell, J.

Action for divorce upon the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. There were findings for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The record has been carefully examined. Neither party has been blameless. The trial court’s finding that the defendant did not cruelly and inhumanly treat the plaintiff, within the meaning of the statute, is well sustained. Stating it favorably to the plaintiff, the question of fact was for the trial court and might have been found for either. We doubt not that the findings were wisely made against the plaintiff’s contention. A review of the evidence is useless.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerlich v. Gerlich, 204 N.W. 465, 163 Minn. 400, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1278 (Mich. 1925).

204 N.W. 465 (Gerlich v. Gerlich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaehler v. Kaehler
18 N.W.2d 312 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1945)