Gerks v. . Weinstein

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Gerks v. . Weinstein

185 S.E. 432, 210 N.C. 90, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 24

DecidedApril 29, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 185 S.E. 432 (Gerks v. . Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerks v. . Weinstein, 185 S.E. 432, 210 N.C. 90, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 24 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the absence of any evidence at the hearing tending to show that the property on which the sheriff has levied is the same property as that described in the chattel mortgage, there was no error in the order denying the motion.

The motion was not supported by affidavit or other proof that the movant has any interest in or title to the property on which the sheriff had levied. The movant failed to show that she had a right to intervene, and for that reason the order denying her motion is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In the absence of any evidence at the hearing tending to show that the property on which the sheriff has levied is the same property as that described in the chattel mortgage, there was no error in the order denying the motion.

The motion was not supported by affidavit or other proof that the movant has any interest in or title to the property on which the sheriff had levied. The movant failed to show that she had a right to intervene, and for that reason the order denying her motion is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.E. 432, 210 N.C. 90, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerks-v-weinstein-nc-1936.