Gerken v. Moody

Supreme Court of Florida

Gerken v. Moody

130 So. 464, 100 Fla. 1172

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 8, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and. inspected, and the Court being now advised of its *1173 judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and. inspected, and the Court being now advised of its *1173 judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Gerken v. Moody, 130 So. 464, 100 Fla. 1172 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

130 So. 464 (Gerken v. Moody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.