Gerhold v. Gerhold
158 A. 437, 109 N.J. Eq. 634, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 864
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Advisory Master Moore.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchakd, Pakkek, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gerhold v. Gerhold, 158 A. 437, 109 N.J. Eq. 634, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 864 (N.J. 1932).
158 A. 437 (Gerhold v. Gerhold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Capodanno v. Commissioner
69 T.C. 638 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)
Canova v. Canova
108 A.2d 287 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Sperling v. Sperling
89 A.2d 71 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Waltz v. Waltz
83 A.2d 904 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)