Gerhauser Bros. v. Estopco, Inc.
251 A.D. 835, 298 N.Y.S. 409, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7883
Opinion
Orders denying motions of the defendant Joseph J. Pear and of the remaim ng defendants to dismiss the plaintiff’s amended complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gerhauser Bros. v. Estopco, Inc., 251 A.D. 835, 298 N.Y.S. 409, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
251 A.D. 835 (Gerhauser Bros. v. Estopco, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.