Gerhauser Bros. v. Estopco, Inc.
This text of 251 A.D. 835 (Gerhauser Bros. v. Estopco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders denying motions of the defendant Joseph J. Pear and of the remaim ng defendants to dismiss the plaintiff’s amended complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 835, 298 N.Y.S. 409, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerhauser-bros-v-estopco-inc-nyappdiv-1937.