Gerhardt v. Manhattan Beach Park, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gerhardt v. Manhattan Beach Park, Inc.

235 A.D. 812

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 812 (Gerhardt v. Manhattan Beach Park, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerhardt v. Manhattan Beach Park, Inc., 235 A.D. 812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order dismissing the complaints reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon condition that the plaintiffs stipulate that the actions be placed upon the day calendar of the Trial Term, Kings county, for May 2, 1932; otherwise, order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the plaintiffs have not unreasonably neglected to bring these actions to trial, and such delay as has ensued since the cases first appeared on the day calendar, was consented to by the defendants’ attorney. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dismissing the complaints reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon condition that the plaintiffs stipulate that the actions be placed upon the day calendar of the Trial Term, Kings county, for May 2, 1932; otherwise, order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the plaintiffs have not unreasonably neglected to bring these actions to trial, and such delay as has ensued since the cases first appeared on the day calendar, was consented to by the defendants’ attorney. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerhardt-v-manhattan-beach-park-inc-nyappdiv-1932.