Gerhard Hey, Inc. v. Cattaraugus Tanning Company
152 N.E. 444, 242 N.Y. 600, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1144
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 241 N. Y. 413.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gerhard Hey, Inc. v. Cattaraugus Tanning Company, 152 N.E. 444, 242 N.Y. 600, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1144 (N.Y. 1926).
152 N.E. 444 (Gerhard Hey, Inc. v. Cattaraugus Tanning Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gerhard & Hey, Inc. v. Cattaraugus Tanning Co.
150 N.E. 500 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)