Gerhard Hey, Inc. v. Cattaraugus Tanning Company
152 N.E. 444, 242 N.Y. 600, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1144
This text of 152 N.E. 444 (Gerhard Hey, Inc. v. Cattaraugus Tanning Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gerhard Hey, Inc. v. Cattaraugus Tanning Company, 152 N.E. 444, 242 N.Y. 600, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1144 (N.Y. 1926).
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 241 N. Y. 413.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gerhard & Hey, Inc. v. Cattaraugus Tanning Co.
150 N.E. 500 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
152 N.E. 444, 242 N.Y. 600, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerhard-hey-inc-v-cattaraugus-tanning-company-ny-1926.