Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 601
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 23, 1961
DocketReap. Dec. 9921; Entry No. 1037037
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 601 (Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 601 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Eule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a ease does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cust. Ct. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerhard-hey-co-v-united-states-cusc-1961.