Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United States
30 Cust. Ct. 463, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 384
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Cust. Ct. 580 →
United States Customs Court·Decided May 28, 1953·No. No. 57354; protest 201153-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 463, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 384 (cusc 1953).
30 Cust. Ct. 463 (Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 40 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)
Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 44 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)