Geremia v. State
This text of 961 So. 2d 1042 (Geremia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Florida v. Nixon, 543 U.S. 175, 186-87, 125 S.Ct. 551, 160 L.Ed.2d 565 (2004) (reversing Nixon v. State, 857 So.2d 172 (Fla.2003), because Florida Supreme Court erroneously held that “counsel’s failure to obtain the defendant’s express consent to a strategy of conceding guilt ... automatically renders counsel’s performance deficient”); Harvey v. State, 946 So.2d 937, 943-44 (Fla.2006) (noting counsel said nothing more to jury than what defendant said in confession counsel knew would be heard by jury); Davis v. State, 928 So.2d 1089, 1116 (Fla.2005) (holding counsel’s strategic decisions did not constitute ineffective assistance).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
961 So. 2d 1042, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10998, 2007 WL 2065775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geremia-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.