Gerdes v. Smith

488 So. 2d 837, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 860, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7262
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 7, 1986
DocketNo. 86-463
StatusPublished

This text of 488 So. 2d 837 (Gerdes v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerdes v. Smith, 488 So. 2d 837, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 860, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This case is before this court on a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner seeks review of an order denying bail reduction. Petitioner is charged with three drug-related felonies and upon his appearance before the magistrate setting bail he was granted release, but conditioned upon $700,000.00 bail. He appeared before a judge a second time requesting a reduction in bail. He said he could not raise that amount of bail. He also said he owns real estate in Volusia County worth $66,000 and has been a resident of Volusia County since 1971 and can readily obtain employment and will stay in the county while awaiting trial.

While it appears the bail may be excessive we have no knowledge as to why the bond was in the amount of $700,000.00. The record before us is woefully inadequate for us to grant any relief. We do not have a copy of the information charging the petitioner, nor do we have a copy of the order setting bail or the order denying reduction. The record does not reveal what evidence of guilt was demonstrated below, even though his attorney alleges, before this court, that “The proof against your petitioner is not evident, nor is the presumption great ...” No substantiation of this bare allegation was provided here.

If a person is entitled to release upon a bail lower than that set by the committing magistrate then he must clearly demonstrate that entitlement to the reviewing court. He has failed to demonstrate any such entitlement.

PETITION DENIED.

COBB, C.J., and UPCHURCH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 So. 2d 837, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 860, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerdes-v-smith-fladistctapp-1986.