Gerdes v. Hill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Gerdes v. Hill

69 Ill. App. 320, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 356

DecidedDecember 19, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 69 Ill. App. 320 (Gerdes v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerdes v. Hill, 69 Ill. App. 320, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 356 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion per Curiam.

Action commenced before a justice of the peace for a balance claimed on a promissory note of appellant, assigned before due to appellee, for $175. On trial de novo, upon appealto the Circuit Court, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $90. A new trial was refused and judgment on the verdict rendered, from which defendant appealed.

The defense was payment, and on this single question of fact the evidence was conflicting, but in our opinion clearly sufficient to support the finding. Perceiving no material error in any ruling of the court, its judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion per Curiam.

Action commenced before a justice of the peace for a balance claimed on a promissory note of appellant, assigned before due to appellee, for $175. On trial de novo, upon appealto the Circuit Court, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $90. A new trial was refused and judgment on the verdict rendered, from which defendant appealed.

The defense was payment, and on this single question of fact the evidence was conflicting, but in our opinion clearly sufficient to support the finding. Perceiving no material error in any ruling of the court, its judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 Ill. App. 320, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerdes-v-hill-illappct-1896.