Gerde Newman & Co. v. Fourcade

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Gerde Newman & Co. v. Fourcade

140 So. 85, 19 La. App. 148, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 281

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 7, 1932

DocketNo. 13972

StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 85 (Gerde Newman & Co. v. Fourcade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerde Newman & Co. v. Fourcade, 140 So. 85, 19 La. App. 148, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 281 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, J.

This suit grows out of an alleged sale of twenty-five cases of eggs by the plaintiff,to the defendant.

In the case of Gerde Newman & Company v. Roselino Curcuru (La. App.) 139 So. 83, decided January 11, 1932, a case involving the same party plaintiff and the same principles of law and practically the same facts, the defenses made here were held to be without merit.

We have not changed our view. Consequently, and for the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WESTERFIELD, J.

This suit grows out of an alleged sale of twenty-five cases of eggs by the plaintiff,to the defendant.

In the case of Gerde Newman & Company v. Roselino Curcuru (La. App.) 139 So. 83, decided January 11, 1932, a case involving the same party plaintiff and the same principles of law and practically the same facts, the defenses made here were held to be without merit.

We have not changed our view. Consequently, and for the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 85, 19 La. App. 148, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerde-newman-co-v-fourcade-lactapp-1932.