Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n

2008 CIT 130

• Court: United States Court of International Trade
• Decided: November 25, 2008
• Docket: 01-00955
• Status: Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 08 – 130

J U D G M E N T

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr., Senior Judge

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x : GERDAU AMERISTEEL U.S. INC. et al., : Plaintiffs, : v. : Court No. 01-00955 UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, :

Defendant. :

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

This case having commenced for judicial review of the

preliminary determination of the U.S. International Trade

Commission sub nom. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, South

Africa, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Ukraine, and Venezuela, 66

Fed.Reg. 54,539 (Oct. 29, 2001), that imports of indicated subject

merchandise from Egypt, South Africa and Venezuela allegedly sold

in the United States at less than fair value are negligible and

therefore that its investigations with regard to those countries be

terminated; and the court in slip opinion 02-59, 26 CIT 639, 244

F.Supp.2d 1349 (2002), having remanded that determination for

reconsideration; and the defendant having filed Views of the

Commission on Remand (Aug. 16, 2002) to the effect that Court No. 01-00955 Page 2

imports [of wire rod] from Egypt, South Africa and Venezuela are not negligible, and that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of [wire rod] from Egypt, South Africa, and Venezuela that are allegedly sold in the United States at less than fair value[,]

which Views were affirmed in a final judgment pursuant to slip

opinion 02-113, 26 CIT 1131 (2002); and intervenor-defendants

having appealed therefrom to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the

Federal Circuit, which decided sub nom. Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v.

Int’l Trade Comm’n, 357 F.3d 1294, 1317 (2004), to vacate that

judgment but also to remand for consideration whether the defendant

had erred in concluding that

there was no reasonable indication that wire rod imports from Egypt, South Africa, and Venezuela would imminently exceed statutory negligibility levels, whether considered individually or collectively[;]

and the defendant having filed Views of the Commission (Sept. 9,

2005) to the effect that the subject imports from

South Africa that are allegedly sold in the United States at less than fair value are negligible individually, and that subject imports from Egypt, South Africa and Venezuela that are allegedly sold in the United States at less than fair value are negligible in the aggregate, for purposes of our threat determinations[;]

and the court in slip opinion 07-7, 31 CIT ___ (Jan. 17, 2007),

having concluded that there was not a sustainable relationship

therein between the facts that the defendant finds on remand and Court No. 01-00955 Page 3

the result that it reaches, perhaps due, at least in part, to a

paucity of producer data; and the parties having thereupon

consented to further remand per slip opinion 07-165, 31 CIT ___

(Nov. 8, 2007); and the defendant having filed Views of the

Commission (Third Remand) (March 10, 2008) to the effect that the

subject imports from

South Africa that are allegedly sold in the United States at less than fair value . . . are negligible individually, and that subject imports from Egypt, South Africa, and Venezuela are negligible in the aggregate, for purposes of our threat determinations[,]

which Views are now stated to be based upon a supplemented

administrative record; and the court having now reviewed this

record and finding substantial evidence thereon in support thereof,

it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Views of the

Commission (Third Remand) (March 10, 2008) be, and they hereby are,

affirmed.

Dated: New York, New York November 25, 2008

/s/ Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr. Senior Judge