Gerbino v. Stewart

13 A.D.3d 1067, 786 N.Y.S.2d 769, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16268
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2004·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William E Polito, J.), entered September 23, 2003 in a personal injury action. The [1068]*1068order and judgment were entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants Tinseltown USA and Cinemark USA, Inc.

It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the award of damages for lost wages and as modified the order and judgment is affirmed without costs and a new trial is granted on damages for lost wages.

Same memorandum as Gerbino v Tinseltown USA (13 AD3d 1068 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerbino v. Stewart, 13 A.D.3d 1067, 786 N.Y.S.2d 769, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

13 A.D.3d 1067 (Gerbino v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gerbino v. Tinseltown USA
13 A.D.3d 1068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)