Gerbige v. State
This text of 571 So. 2d 401 (Gerbige v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT
Pursuant to Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 (1989), we hold that the appellant’s claim that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction of receiving stolen property in the first degree is precluded under Temp. Rule 20.2(a)(3) and (5), A.R.Cr.P. Appellant’s claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective because of a failure to file a brief on direct appeal is without merit, Ex parte Dunn, 514 So.2d 1300 (Ala.1987), because the appellant consented to his attorney’s not filing a brief.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
571 So. 2d 401, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1680, 1990 WL 212394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerbige-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.