Gerber v. Prunty
This text of 555 P.2d 488 (Gerber v. Prunty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant sought damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident near Elko, Nevada. Jury verdict was in favor of respondent. Appellant contends the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence. We disagree.
The record contains sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict and, thus, it will not be disturbed. Steen v. Gass, 85 Nev. 249, 454 P.2d 94 (1969); Quilici v. Battaglia, 78 Nev. 413, 374 P.2d 887 (1962); Leete v. Southern Pac. Co., 37 Nev. 49, 139 P.29 (1914).
Other issues raised by appellant are without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 P.2d 488, 92 Nev. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerber-v-prunty-nev-1976.