Gerber v. Prunty

555 P.2d 488, 92 Nev. 597
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 28, 1976·No. No. 8568·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant sought damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident near Elko, Nevada. Jury verdict was in favor of respondent. Appellant contends the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence. We disagree.

The record contains sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict and, thus, it will not be disturbed. Steen v. Gass, 85 Nev. 249, 454 P.2d 94 (1969); Quilici v. Battaglia, 78 Nev. 413, 374 P.2d 887 (1962); Leete v. Southern Pac. Co., 37 Nev. 49, 139 P.29 (1914).

Other issues raised by appellant are without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gerber v. Prunty, 555 P.2d 488, 92 Nev. 597 (Neb. 1976).

555 P.2d 488 (Gerber v. Prunty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. Fantauzzi
584 P.2d 689 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1978)