Gerardy v. Anagram Int'l & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Gerardy v. Anagram Int'l & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

910 N.W.2d 743

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 25, 2018·No. A17-1507·Published

Opinion

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 15, 2017, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 15, 2017, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Gerardy v. Anagram Int'l & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 910 N.W.2d 743 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

910 N.W.2d 743 (Gerardy v. Anagram Int'l & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related