Gerardo Sanchez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 26, 2009
Docket04-09-00436-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gerardo Sanchez v. State (Gerardo Sanchez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gerardo Sanchez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion




                      • • • •



MEMORANDUM OPINION


No. 04-09-00436-CR


Gerardo SANCHEZ,

Appellant


v.


The STATE of Texas,

Appellee


From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CR-1341

Honorable David A. Berchelmann, Jr., Judge Presiding


PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

                        Rebecca Simmons, Justice

                        Steven C. Hilbig, Justice


Delivered and Filed: August 26, 2009


DISMISSED

            On August 7, 2009, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record on or before September 8, 2009. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant’s counsel filed a response in which she states that she has reviewed the electronic record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant;” counsel concedes that the appeal must be dismissed. In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gerardo Sanchez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerardo-sanchez-v-state-texapp-2009.