Gerardo Martinez-Segura v. State of Florida
This text of Gerardo Martinez-Segura v. State of Florida (Gerardo Martinez-Segura v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-4762 _____________________________
GERARDO MARTINEZ-SEGURA,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Russell Healey, Judge.
May 2, 2019
PER CURIAM.
Gerardo Martinez-Segura appeals an order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion. Consistent with the State’s concession, we reverse in part. The trial court erred in summarily denying as to grounds four and five, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel’s advice (or lack of advice) regarding the deportation consequences of Martinez-Segura’s plea. On remand, the trial court must either attach records conclusively refuting these allegations or hold an evidentiary hearing. As to the remaining grounds, we affirm.
AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.
ROWE, BILBREY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Gerardo Martinez-Segura, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gerardo Martinez-Segura v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerardo-martinez-segura-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.