Gerardo Corral, A/K/A Rodney Serna, A/K/A Alfred Hernandez v. State
This text of Gerardo Corral, A/K/A Rodney Serna, A/K/A Alfred Hernandez v. State (Gerardo Corral, A/K/A Rodney Serna, A/K/A Alfred Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-11-00053-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
SEPTEMBER 19, 2011
GERALDO CORRAL, A/K/A RODNEY SERNA, A/K/A ALFRED HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF SHERMAN COUNTY;
NO. 878; HONORABLE RON ENNS, JUDGE
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Appellant Geraldo Corral was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual
assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child. Through his retained
counsel, appellant filed notice of appeal and an affidavit of inability to pay for the
appellate record. After an April 2011 hearing, the trial court found appellant was entitled
to a free reporter’s record.1 Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. The clerk’s record and reporter’s
record were filed. After we granted two extensions of time to file appellant’s brief, his
1 According to the reporter’s record of the April 2011 hearing, appellant’s family paid his attorney’s fee. retained counsel moved to withdraw from representation, stating the record contains no
non-frivolous ground for appeal. We granted the motion and notified appellant his brief
is due October 24, 2011.
On September 6, appellant filed two hand-written letters. The thrust of the
letters’ content is a request for legal assistance with his appeal. Based on this record, it
appears unlikely appellant’s brief will be timely filed, making it necessary we remand the
case for a hearing. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). It also appears from the record that
appellant may be indigent and entitled to appointed counsel on appeal. But this too is a
determination for the trial court. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art 1.051(d)(1) (West
Supp. 2010). In this circumstance, and to expedite the appeal, we abate the appeal and
remand the cause to the 69th District Court of Sherman County for further proceedings.
Tex. R. App. P. 2. On remand, the trial court shall use whatever means it finds
necessary, which may include noticing and conducting a hearing, to determine 1)
whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and 2) whether appellant is indigent
and entitled to appointed counsel. The trial court shall execute pertinent findings and
recommendations on these matters. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).
If the court finds appellant desires to pursue the appeal and is indigent, the court
shall appoint counsel to represent appellant’s interest on appeal. In that event, the
court shall cause the name, address, telephone number, fax number, and state bar
number of the new attorney to be provided to this court.
The trial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record
containing the findings and recommendations and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the
2 evidence and argument presented at any hearing held. The supplemental clerk’s record
and reporter’s record, if any, shall be filed by the trial court with the clerk of this court on
or before October 24, 2011. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks,
the trial court may request same on or before October 24, 2011.
Unless extended on motion, appellant’s brief shall be due November 14, 2011.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gerardo Corral, A/K/A Rodney Serna, A/K/A Alfred Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerardo-corral-aka-rodney-serna-aka-alfred-hernand-texapp-2011.