Gerardo Azpera v. Dr. Kao Vang

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 GERARDO AZPERA, No. 2:25-cv-3265 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. The only named defendant in this 18 action is Kao Vang. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) Plaintiff’s complaint was filed with the court on 19 November 7, 2025. (Id.) The court’s own records reveal that on November 3, 2025, plaintiff 20 filed a complaint containing very similar, if not identical, allegations against defendant Vang 21 (2:25-cv-3197 AC.).1 Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed 22 as duplicative of case no. 2:25-cv-3197 AC. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order, 24 plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed as duplicative of 2:25-cv-3197 25 AC. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action. 26 /// 27 1 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 28 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980). 1 |} Dated: May 29, 2026 Cin □□□ CHI SOO KIM 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 || Azpe3265.0sc/2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28