Gerardi v. Polk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gerardi v. Polk

220 So. 2d 387, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6026

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 20, 1969

DocketNo. K-390

StatusPublished

This text of 220 So. 2d 387 (Gerardi v. Polk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gerardi v. Polk, 220 So. 2d 387, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6026 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs have appealed a final judgment based upon a jury verdict awarding them damages for personal injuries received in a vehicular collision proximately caused by defendant’s negligence. The sole point on appeal challenges the trial court’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the ground that the damages awarded plaintiff Loretta Gerardi are inadequate.

Appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed.¹

WIGGINTON, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs have appealed a final judgment based upon a jury verdict awarding them damages for personal injuries received in a vehicular collision proximately caused by defendant’s negligence. The sole point on appeal challenges the trial court’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the ground that the damages awarded plaintiff Loretta Gerardi are inadequate.

Appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed.¹

WIGGINTON, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 So. 2d 387, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gerardi-v-polk-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack