Gerard v. T. a. Clarke Co.
225 A.D. 673
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1928·Published
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs .to abide the event. There is a defect in the proof with respect to the financial ability of the proposed purchasers. (Alt v. Doscher, 102 App. Div. 344; Rosenblatt v. Bergen, 202 id. 220; Mackay v. Tide Water Oil Co., 186 id. 1.) This disposition makes it unnecessary at this time to pass upon the other questions urged on this appeal. Lazansky, P. J, Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gerard v. T. a. Clarke Co., 225 A.D. 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
225 A.D. 673 (Gerard v. T. a. Clarke Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alt v. Doscher
102 A.D. 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)