Geraldine Odom Williamson, Individually and D/B/A Miramar Resort Hotel v. Alberta Gudino, Individually and as Next Friend of Serafin Gudino and as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ernesto Gudino and Sergio Gudino

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 14, 2003
Docket13-02-00445-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Geraldine Odom Williamson, Individually and D/B/A Miramar Resort Hotel v. Alberta Gudino, Individually and as Next Friend of Serafin Gudino and as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ernesto Gudino and Sergio Gudino (Geraldine Odom Williamson, Individually and D/B/A Miramar Resort Hotel v. Alberta Gudino, Individually and as Next Friend of Serafin Gudino and as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ernesto Gudino and Sergio Gudino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geraldine Odom Williamson, Individually and D/B/A Miramar Resort Hotel v. Alberta Gudino, Individually and as Next Friend of Serafin Gudino and as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ernesto Gudino and Sergio Gudino, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-02-445-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

GERALDINE ODOM WILLIAMSON, INDIVIDUALLY

AND D/B/A MIRAMAR RESORT HOTEL , Appellant,

v.



ALBERTA GUDINO, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS

NEXT FRIEND OF SERAFIN GUDINO AND AS

LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF

ERNESTO GUDINO , Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Rodriguez

Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, GERALDINE ODOM WILLIAMSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MIRAMAR RESORT HOTEL , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-387-01-B . After the record was filed, the parties filed a joint motion to remand to the trial court and for expedited mandate. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a compromise settlement agreement in this matter. The parties request that this Court remand the entire case to the trial court for proceedings in furtherance of consummating the settlement, which includes the vacating of the judgment and ad litem fee order by the trial court, entry of a take-nothing judgment, and release and discharge of the supersedeas bond. The parties agree that each party will bear their own costs of appeal. The parties further request that issuance of the mandate be expedited.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties' joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the parties' settlement agreement. The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to expedite issuance of the mandate to the trial court.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 14th day of August, 2003 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Geraldine Odom Williamson, Individually and D/B/A Miramar Resort Hotel v. Alberta Gudino, Individually and as Next Friend of Serafin Gudino and as Legal Representative of the Estate of Ernesto Gudino and Sergio Gudino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geraldine-odom-williamson-individually-and-dba-miramar-resort-hotel-v-texapp-2003.