Geraldine Husk v. Botsford Continuing Care Corporation
This text of Geraldine Husk v. Botsford Continuing Care Corporation (Geraldine Husk v. Botsford Continuing Care Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 8, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 146622 & (9)(10)(11) Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, SUZANNE HASLIP, Attorney in Fact for Justices GERALDINE HUSK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 146622 COA: 313729 Oakland CC: 2011-123524-NH BOTSFORD CONTINUING CARE CORPORATION and ZIEGER HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motions to waive stay requirement and for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.
VIVIANO, J., not participating.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 8, 2013 _________________________________________ s0305 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Geraldine Husk v. Botsford Continuing Care Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geraldine-husk-v-botsford-continuing-care-corporat-mich-2013.